The otherkin subculture is made up of people who usually believe themselves to be mythological or legendary creatures. It deserves to be noted that Otherkin is just a label to describe personal beliefs, experiences, and traits that occur in a variety of combinations depending on the individual. As there is no consensus on what qualifies as Otherkin, not everyone who shares similar beliefs feels the term is appropriate or useful for themselves. The word is an Internet-derived neologism primarily used by members of that subculture and is somewhat fluid in definition, sometimes being broadened to also describe those who consider themselves to be animals, aliens, extradimensional beings, and other non-human entities.
The general consensus of Otherkin shows the majority seem to have memories of a past life as another specific entity, usually a sentient being. A Therian on the other hand, typically describes their Therian nature not as a past life or a specific entity, but an animal type in general.
While, by this definition, Therianthropes fall into the Otherkin classification, there is a distinguishable difference between the two groups. Whereas most Otherkin are of mythical creatures, Therians are strictly animalistic and recognize their humanity as being an integral part of their existance.
With the basic premiss of the Otherkin concept, there has been skepticism directed at it along with the proposal that many people adopt the Otherkin identity to justify social difficulties - the outcast syndrome - or because they have a delusion and are in denial about their biological humanity. The idea that Otherkin believe they are physically non-human in a spectacular way - such as actually being biological dragons - is seen as a surprising yet pervasive misunderstanding among Otherkin themselves, who point out the spiritual and psychological focus of the concept.
It has been postulated within the community that this confusion arises from those unfamiliar with the concept or having only a sketchy and perhaps distorted awareness; comparing it to psychiatric cases such as lycanthropy and dissociative identity disorder, concluding that in order for someone to state that they identify as an elf or gryphon, they must be experiencing a form of hallucination or delusion.
Some hold these beliefs not as a search for the truth, but as a way to help understand and explore themselves. Indeed, as the community has expanded and become more self-analytical in recent years, a number of otherkin have begun explaining their association with non-human imagery as nothing but an exercise to help become in touch with their true selves.
Most otherkin believe they have non-human aspects that are either spiritual or philosophical in nature. According to otherkin.net some claim that they are human in a physical sense but non-human ("other") in a mental or spiritual one. Some otherkin attribute this discrepancy to reincarnation or a soul for another species incarnated as a human.
There are also otherkin who believe themselves to be biologically non-human who consider themselves to be physically members of the species they associate themselves with, or at least directly descended from the species through intermarriage with humanity. This belief is rarer within the subculture and sometimes the subject of criticism from otherkin who do not share it. Some otherkin who do not necessarily claim that they are genetically non-human do profess to have non-human sides that have somehow influenced their physical bodies, according to otherkin.net.
Some otherkin claim to be combinations of different non-human species, such as elf-werewolf or dragon-cat hybrids. Others believe that they are able to mentally or astrally change between different types of nonhuman beings or even that all otherkin are capable of this.
Some members of the otherkin subculture have drawn parallels between their beliefs and transsexuality, resulting in the neologism trans-speciesism, the conviction that one is in a body of the wrong species.
Despite the general conviction in the community that otherkin are born, not made, there is no clear definition of what constitutes otherness. One effect of this is that anyone who asserts mainstream otherkin status is very unlikely to be contradicted by the community itself, though more specific claims, or attempts to ascribe specific qualities to all otherkin, are more likely to meet opposition.
The otherkin subculture describes the process of beginning to identify oneself as otherkin as Awakening. The process of Awakening has been compared to that of religious revelation or religious conversion. Depending on the individual concerned, it can be either a very sudden or gradual process, and can be a pleasant, self-validating experience, or sometimes a traumatic one.
Many otherkin maintain that their perceived non-human traits are innate, not acquired. In the Awakening process, they generally believe that something is being revealed about themselves that had previously been hidden. Otherkin frequently attest to lifelong feelings of alienation or loneliness, or of homesickness for places they have never seen or cannot identify. They may claim higher levels of psychic, magical or spiritual awareness; on the other hand, some claim none of these things.
In most cases, although there may have been prior vague feelings of detachment from humanity, self-identification specifically as an otherkin is triggered by encounters with or references to otherkin.
The community grew out of the elven online community of the early-to-mid-1990s, with the earliest recorded use of the term otherkin appearing in early 1996; however, from the context it appears in, the term seems to have been well established in certain communities by this point already. According to otherkin.net, the term was originally coined when it became clear that a new subculture of people identifying themselves as a number of different mythological creatures, such as fairies, unicorns, and satyrs, and not just as elves, was emerging.
However, the term has expanded in its meaning over time and is often used nowadays as a term to describe a number of distinct but related communities. Examples include the draconic, vampiric and therianthropic communities, all of which share similar core beliefs but, according to otherkin.net have members who do not consider themselves part of the overall otherkin community. Although some furry lifestylers (a subset of the furry fandom) also hold beliefs similar to those of the otherkin community, there is debate in the two communities over whether or not to consider them "otherkin" as well.
There is some overlap between many role-playing and otherkin communities, and some otherkin beliefs are similar to elements found in role-playing games and other fictional sources. Others at otherkin.net, however, stresses the difference they see between pretending to be a non-human and actually believing oneself to be non-human.
Reactions:
Outside of their own subculture, otherkin beliefs are often met with controversy
When mental health professionals have encountered individuals who believe that they can transform into an animal or are otherwise non-human in some way, they have sometimes diagnosed the condition as clinical lycanthropy or some other mental disorder. Others outside of the subculture see a clear parallel between clinical lycanthropy and otherkin beliefs. There are currently no known psychological studies of the otherkin subculture evaluating the claims of either side.
Draconity indicates a state of being a dragon, draconic, or dragon-like. More specifically it is a term used by a subculture of people who believe themselves to be a dragon in a psychological, spiritual, or (rarely) a biological sense. The term "draconity," along with the subculture that originated it, seems to have arisen in the mid-1990s through internet communication media such as Usenet newsgroups (particularly alt.fan.dragons) and IRC. Although many draconic individuals interact online, and some only declared themselves to be dragons after finding this subculture, equally many dragons identified themselves as such far prior to knowing the subculture even existed.
Most commonly, draconic individuals base their personal definition of "dragon" upon traits they have found in spiritual self-exploration, which may differ greatly from the traits displayed by traditional definitions of dragons. Others will identify themselves with mythological standards such as European/Western and Chinese/Eastern dragons. Yet others adhere to the classifications found in works of fiction such as the Pernese dragons of Anne McCaffrey's novels and the classes of dragons as defined by Dungeons & Dragons and other related role-playing games.
The influx of dragons styled after role-playing game standards has become an issue of concern for long-standing members of the online dragon communities. The ease of use of many modern online forums for communications within the community such as IRC and the more descriptive MU* interfaces (such as Alfandria) has attracted a number of dragon fans who use the sites as a medium for roleplay purposes. There is some fear that this tends to dilute the population of "genuine" dragons and discredits the subculture as a whole. Being a fringe group, the draconic community is primarily visible online, but draconity-themed gatherings, often called "dragon gathers", do occur offline in various places around the world.
Draconity may be viewed as a subset of otherkin and is thus subject to the same questions regarding its exact nature and the ramifications of such a belief on the individual.
What is “being a therian or therianthrope” ? |
| |
|
Because this is a personal self-perception, identification or discovery over time, the ways in which a person describes his or her self-identification as a therianthrope vary considerably. Some therians pretend to carry physical traits of their animal in their human form. This is the case of the large black eyebrows or long nose of the lycanthropes. In the most sever forms, society would typically refers to them as freaks because of their unusual appearances. Many who report such a scenario do such as personal experience, and do not claim to understand its cause or be sure of their interpretation. Different therians may believe that the reason for this feeling is psychological, mystical, spiritual, neurobiological, or metaphysical in nature, or the result of some combination of these or other factors. The terms therian, therianthrope, and were are more or less interchangeable in the community, but there is a shift towards encouraging people to use the term "therian" instead of "were", to avoid confusion with the idea of fictional, mythological, or "hollywood" werewolves. |
| |
|
PowersMost therianthropes -do not- have heightened senses nor do they possess traits like unusually sharp teeth, strange eye color, claws, etc. Therianthropes do not have the ability to physically change into animals, nor are they anything akin to werewolves, vampires, or any other such monstrous creatures. Therianthropy is a spiritual-mental experience and does not involve any sort of supernatural abilities or traits.Degree of identificationIn either case, the identification with the non-human animal may be partial, as in those who regard themselves as having both human and non-human attributes, or complete, as in those who regard themselves as essentially non-human animals in human bodies. The terms species dysphoria and transspeciesism have occasionally been used to refer to the latter phenomenon, in parallel with the concepts of gender dysphoria and transsexuality.Species involvedMost therians identify with a single type of non-human animal, but there are some who identify with more than one — sometimes related animals, as in several different species of feline or canine, for example, but sometimes completely dissimilar animals. Those who identify with all members of one family — for instance, someone who claims to have characteristics of all felines — is called a cladotherianthrope.The species of non-human animal with which a particular therian identifies is sometimes referred to as that person's theriotype or phenotype. The term phenotype was originally more common but has fallen into disuse because it also refers to physical appearance. This animal side can be really any animal, most common are predatory animals such as wolves, bears, foxes, jaguars, tigers, and cougars, but there are also reptiles, avians, other mammals, and insects. just to name a few. Because the majority of therianthropes identify often as big cats and wolves, some skeptics argue that, because of the preponderance of predators or other dangerous species, most therians are purposefully or unconsciously claiming inner association with impressive animals for ego-based purposes. There are also some individuals who identify with mythical species (e.g. dragons, elves, gryphons, centaurs and so forth), but those who fit more in the otherkin community than the therian community. Perceptive changes and integration/separationThe different sides of a therian have some element of distinct and different processes and ways of being. The term shifting is often used to signify aspects of the collective shift of perceptions and cognitive outlook, and the changes to how they experience the world, following a change from human to non-human outlook or back. So for example, mental shift would describe the change within the cognitive and mental processes. This may be voluntary or involuntary, partial or complete, substantial or subtle, or may vary. Thus it generally refers to any manner by which, in changing this way, a therianthrope's nature is evidenced internally (to themselves) or externally to others.A controversial aspect of therianthropy is the subject of physical shifting (ie shapeshifting). Few people within the subculture doubt that shifts of mental and emotional perception may occur, however some therianthropes also claim to experience a subtle or gross physical change to their appearance. Whilst subtle physical and internal changes are everyday effects of mood and personality changes (eg eye focus, skin color, perceptions, neurological patterns and habits), most people, both in the therianthrope subculture and outside it, would seriously doubt that gross body changes to physical form can actually occur in this way. http://www.therianthropes.com/index.htm |
| |